![an inconvenient truth wiki an inconvenient truth wiki](https://grist.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/todd-stern-rhea-suh-van-jones.jpg)
Keen is so blinded by the word “free” he misses the fact that when people discuss the use of “free” as a part of a business model, they’re talking about using it to make money. As anyone who actually looks at the details knows, that’s simply not true.
![an inconvenient truth wiki an inconvenient truth wiki](https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/charmed-reboot/images/b/b0/An_Inconvenient_Truth_Promotional_2.jpg)
Keen has set up a totally bogus strawman, that “open source” and “free” mean you don’t make any money. Spot the rather obvious logical fallacy? The one even your sixth grader could point out? Right. In it, Keen announces that the current financial crisis will put an end to open source and “free” business models because the crisis will mean that people actually have to make money. His latest piece, pointed out by Slashdot, is no exception. So far, I have yet to read anything by Keen that isn’t easily torn apart as laughably false, which reinforces the idea that everything he writes is satire. The most amusing, of course, may be his condemnation of Larry Lessig, whose position he gets almost 100% factually incorrect. He relies on incredibly weak reasoning - all of which are things he insists that amteurs do, but pros such as himself don’t do, because they have editors and such. There are some who believe that Keen’s entire personality is satire, because everything he accuses “amateurs” of doing, he does himself. Related DocumentariesĪndrew Keen: Put Some Money Behind Your Predictions?įrom the who-actually-listens-to-this-guy deptĪndrew Keen, of course, is a guy who has written a laughably bad book about how only experts like himself should be able write things, because all those “amateurs” get stuff wrong. It quickly becomes clear that there are camps of both believers and critics. In addition, the parties involved discuss Wikipedia’s ethics and quality of content.
#An inconvenient truth wiki free
The online encyclopedia that everyone can contribute to and revise is now even bigger than the illustrious Encyclopedia Britannica.ĭoes this spell the end for traditional institutions of knowledge such as Britannica? And should we applaud this development as progress or mourn it as a loss? How reliable is Wikipedia? Do “the people” really hold the lease on wisdom? And since when do we believe that information should be free for all? In this film, “Wikipedians,” the folks who spend their days writing and editing articles, explain how the online encyclopedia works. Only five people are employed by the company, and all its activities are financed by donations and subsidies. Is it a revolution, or pure hype? Director IJsbrand van Veelen goes looking for the truth behind Wikipedia. But do we really know what we’re using? Backlight plunges into the story behind Wikipedia and explores the wonderful world of Web 2.0. For the past two years, this free online “encyclopedia of the people” has been topping the lists of the world’s most popular websites. Google or Wikipedia? Those of us who search online – and who doesn’t? – are getting referred more and more to Wikipedia.